Oddsworth

An Oddsworth Opinion

The hurdle in the case for releasing Grace Harris

Could releasing Grace Harris make sense for Royal Challengers Bengaluru? The strongest argument for keeping her is substantial: our ratings place her second among women's T20 batters across every side, worth 8.9 runs a match more than an average player. That is a demanding standard for a replacement to meet.

The case for keeping her is the stronger one. A decision about an overseas batting place should give considerable weight to that standing, and moving Harris out means backing someone else to offer more.

Our top-rated women's T20 battersRuns a match better than an average player
  1. 1. Phoebe Litchfield · Australia+9.4
  2. 2. Grace Harris · Australia+8.9
  3. 3. Nat Sciver-Brunt · England+8.5
  4. 4. Shafali Verma · India+8.2
  5. 5. Smriti Mandhana · India+7.3
  6. 6. Danielle Wyatt · England+7.1
  7. 7. Beth Mooney · Australia+6.3
  8. 8. Georgia Voll · Australia+6.3

The pace worth keeping

Across women's T20 cricket over the last two years, Harris has a batting strike rate of 146.7, against 98.3 for top-seven batters. Her appeal to Royal Challengers Bengaluru is clear: she scores quickly enough to change what an innings can become. Releasing her would mean surrendering that demonstrated attacking threat.

The speed also comes with a batting average of 24.44 over that period, against 18.34 for women's T20 top-seven batters. Her aggression has produced a better average than the benchmark as well. That strengthens the retention argument because the scoring rate has substance behind it.

The frustration is real

Her recent London Spirit innings explain why the decision invites debate. Against Sunrisers Leeds, Harris made 51 from 27 balls. That innings gives a concrete example of the scoring power Royal Challengers Bengaluru would be letting go: an attacking contribution that lasted beyond an opening burst.

Then came a duck against Birmingham Phoenix and a score of 1 against Welsh Fire. Those returns make dissatisfaction understandable. A batter retained for her attacking influence still needs to stay in long enough to exert it, and Harris gave herself little room in those innings.

Any replacement has to be a better overseas batter on merit. Harris's failures give that argument an opening, while her sustained scoring pace and standing give Royal Challengers Bengaluru a stronger reason to keep her. They should retain Harris and demand that she turn that ability into more innings of consequence.

More on Oddsworth

Share